<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the Libertarian Problem?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://georgedonnelly.com/libertarian/what-is-the-libertarian-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://georgedonnelly.com/libertarian/what-is-the-libertarian-problem</link>
	<description>A Left Libertarian Market Anarchist Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:35:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: George Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://georgedonnelly.com/libertarian/what-is-the-libertarian-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-8416</link>
		<dc:creator>George Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgedonnelly.com/?p=1830#comment-8416</guid>
		<description>The Zero-Aggression Principle is the foundation of the “government does a bad job of protecting rights” claim tho. You don&#039;t even get to rights without the ZAP.

Thanks for commenting, Sean. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zero-Aggression Principle is the foundation of the “government does a bad job of protecting rights” claim tho. You don&#8217;t even get to rights without the ZAP.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting, Sean. <img src='http://georgedonnelly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lynch</title>
		<link>http://georgedonnelly.com/libertarian/what-is-the-libertarian-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-8415</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgedonnelly.com/?p=1830#comment-8415</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;government does a bad job of protecting rights&quot; is a much better argument than &quot;government uses aggression and therefore is bad.&quot; In fact, I don&#039;t even agree with the latter argument, yet I&#039;m ultra-liberatarian (closest to agorism, though I don&#039;t agree with all their ideas).

Of course, it doesn&#039;t matter what argument you use if you&#039;re a policy libertarian, trying to convince people to vote government away. You&#039;re not gonna get anything done anyway. Government is not the solution to government, and the only way to reliably limit government is to have a way to reliably swap out the elites periodically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;government does a bad job of protecting rights&#8221; is a much better argument than &#8220;government uses aggression and therefore is bad.&#8221; In fact, I don&#8217;t even agree with the latter argument, yet I&#8217;m ultra-liberatarian (closest to agorism, though I don&#8217;t agree with all their ideas).</p>
<p>Of course, it doesn&#8217;t matter what argument you use if you&#8217;re a policy libertarian, trying to convince people to vote government away. You&#8217;re not gonna get anything done anyway. Government is not the solution to government, and the only way to reliably limit government is to have a way to reliably swap out the elites periodically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://georgedonnelly.com/libertarian/what-is-the-libertarian-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-8414</link>
		<dc:creator>George Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgedonnelly.com/?p=1830#comment-8414</guid>
		<description>So are you arguing for pacifism? Probably not but someone could be confused if you&#039;re just against coercion. After all, self-defense can involve coercion but there&#039;s nothing wrong with that.

I use aggression as a less obscure synonym of &quot;initiation of force.&quot;

Thanks for commenting, Alex. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you arguing for pacifism? Probably not but someone could be confused if you&#8217;re just against coercion. After all, self-defense can involve coercion but there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.</p>
<p>I use aggression as a less obscure synonym of &#8220;initiation of force.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting, Alex. <img src='http://georgedonnelly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Ryan</title>
		<link>http://georgedonnelly.com/libertarian/what-is-the-libertarian-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-8413</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://georgedonnelly.com/?p=1830#comment-8413</guid>
		<description>You are exactly right.
I would go a little further though...
To me the word &quot;aggression&quot; means &quot;strong coercion&quot;.
However, &quot;strong coercion&quot; is but the maturation of the seedling of &quot;mild coercion&quot;, and the seed from which all coercion springs is &quot;fear&quot;.
IMHO ... The root of all evil is the choice to use coercion in response to the impulse of fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are exactly right.<br />
I would go a little further though&#8230;<br />
To me the word &#8220;aggression&#8221; means &#8220;strong coercion&#8221;.<br />
However, &#8220;strong coercion&#8221; is but the maturation of the seedling of &#8220;mild coercion&#8221;, and the seed from which all coercion springs is &#8220;fear&#8221;.<br />
IMHO &#8230; The root of all evil is the choice to use coercion in response to the impulse of fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
